Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
A1 is OOB for a throw-in. B1 is guarding the thrower. A1 releases the ball on a throw-in pass, and B1 jumps in the air attempting to deflect the pass, but does not touch the ball. B1 then lands directly in front of A1, who is still OOB in the throw-in spot, with his feet squarely on the OOB line. In entering the court A1 runs directly into, over, and through B1.
Is this a player control foul on A1? Remember B1 has his feet OOB when A1 runs over him.
Is this a block on B1? Remember A1 has his feet OOB at the time of contact, since he has just finished a throw-in and is returning to the court.
Is this a double foul since both players have feet OOB?
Is this there nothing to be called?
Take that rules book editor!
|
How could it possibly be a PC foul on A1?
|
You're right. I goofed. Since A1 has released the ball, I should have written charging foul on A1.
Try the question now.
|
EDIT ORIGINAL TO ADD THIS:
BTW, as an afterthought I'll add that even if the ball had NOT been released on the throw-in it could not be a PC on A1
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
It's not clear from your post the throw-in is actually over but assuming it is why does the new wording require a foul must be called in your play?
|
While this new wording doesn't require a foul to be called, I have written the situation to be that A1 runs over B1, under the other rules for contact that are still in place,it seems that a foul should be called on this play. Maybe you are voting for letting the whole mess go without a call of any kind.
|
Maybe I am.
[Edited by Dan_ref on Aug 1st, 2003 at 08:10 AM]