View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 17, 2015, 12:20am
johnny d johnny d is offline
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refhoop View Post
Just saw an inbounds with 26.2 in a 77-75 game (Utah lead and possession, baseline throw-in following a made basket).
After dribbling for nine seconds, Utah player throws the ball from the back court to the front court and the ball doesn't get touched (gain front court status) till 16.9, with a whistle for a foul to stop play simultaneously with the ball gaining front court status. However, the clock doesn't stopped till 15.6.
Help me understand why:
a. This is not a back court violation in NCAA Men's?
b. The officials don't clearly see that it was 26.2 and now 15.6?
c. This does not go to review to see: If the ball gained front court status in time or if the clock needed to be reset?
Why would it be a backcourt violation, according to you, the foul occurred at 16.9, which is less than 10 seconds.

They cannot use a potential backcourt violation as the reason to review the monitor.

Yes, they should have better clock awareness and make sure the correct time, 16.9, according to you gets put back on the clock.
Reply With Quote