Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
I assume you meant 4-4-6. Fair point. But WRT this situation, that seems to be in direct conflict with 4-4-2.
If I ever see this (doubtful), I know what the intent of 4-4-6 is and I will defer to the more reasonable logic of 4-4-2.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
At what point in the "hopping process" do you decide that 4-4-2 supersedes 4-4-6?