View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:04pm
jmkupka jmkupka is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 648
No, that's not what I imply, just wanted to make sure the protection from INT was granted as soon as she attained the base (as long as the "attainment" itself didn't cause/contribute to the INT).
MD's response seems to indicate that's not necessarily so...

Again, don't know if it's relevant, but it's not too far of a stretch to say that R1 could see that the only way she was going to be safe at 2B was to get there in time for F6 to bump into her and fail to catch the ball.

Last edited by jmkupka; Mon Oct 26, 2015 at 01:11pm.
Reply With Quote