Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
Why wouldn't a sub be allowed after an OOB call in any rule set?
|
+1. The fact that the C makes a timing correction has absolutely, positively nothing to do with substitutions here.
On a separate note, I'd be interested to know what kind of definite knowledge/official information the C had with which to make a timing correction. I mean, maybe he started a five second count on the rebound, but I doubt it. Even in NCAA with a monitor I'm not sure if there's much to change here. It's one thing to put time back on after the clock A) should have stopped or B) started when it shouldn't have. It's a different thing to take time off that never came off in the first place (absent some kind of definite knowledge, of course).