View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 29, 2015, 03:41pm
teebob21 teebob21 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Northeast Nebraska
Posts: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Honestly, if the third person is correct (you were inconsistent and erratic), the first two could also both have been correct... on the pitches they were watching.

Fix the inconsistency first. THEN, if you are too high or too low, adjust.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EsqUmp View Post
Is it possible that you overcorrected? Perhaps both were right.
This is totally possible. Without game film on both games, I have no way of knowing. That said, I'm not that worried about it (plate stance improvements) - teams don't often complain about my zone and the evaluators this week said the ball/strike calls were solid even though they had nitpicks on the stance. I was mostly curious how others have processed conflicting feedback like that...and ATLSteve's response was super helpful.
__________________
Powder blue since 1998. Longtime forum lurker.
Umpiring Goals: Call the knee strike accurately (getting the low pitch since 2017)/NCAA D1 postseason/ISF-WBSC Certification/Nat'l Indicator Fraternity(completed)
"I'm gonna call it ASA for the foreseeable future. You all know what I mean."
Reply With Quote