Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
That question seems contradictory -- it contains two different concepts.
The travelling DOES negate the continuous motion -- any basket cannot count; there cannot be an "and-1" on the play.
The travelling DOES NOT negate the fact that the foul occurred during a shooting motion. Award two FTs.
|
i agree with number 1. if there is a travel there cannot be a goal. i dont agree so much with the second point. i think the issue here is whether the player who travels after contact was ever in the act of shooting. Just bringing the ball up could be a shot or pass. i look at the entire play to see what happens. im aware that the foul could prevent shot etc...i dont always make the determination of "in the act" at the moment of contact because at times i cant be sure.
i will error on the side of giving 2 shots but there's an argument that the player who does not release the ball within proper foot movements is NOT in the act....