Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan
The screener hit the trifecta:
1. He caused the contact
2. The contact delayed his opponent
3. The screener wasn't given a chance to stop or change direction
As to why it wasn't called I go with JRut's reasoning: Maybe it hadn't been called up to that point in the 1st half.
|
1. Screens are supposed to cause contact.
2. Screens are supposed to delay the opponent.
3. Screens are no necessarily supposed to allow you to change direction or stop if they give you the proper time and distance.
If anything I am wondering was the screener outside of his frame a not allowing normal movement? That would have been the reason I would have called a foul in this case.
But overall the angle is bad and hard to ultimately tell. It is just not a slam dunk.
Peace