View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 08, 2015, 03:33pm
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
...I don't see this as a sure thing that the runner would have made it to second barring the obstruction, therefore I have him/her only protected to first base...
I don't use "sure thing" as the standard. While it does need to be judged as the base the runner would have achieved, meaning that it is not an award as a penalty; the runner must have had a reasonably good chance to have reached the advanced base. The benefit of the doubt goes to the runner. This is a bit lower than a sure thing standard. That's what I do, anyway.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote