Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Then I do not understand your argument. My argument is that if you are arguing "air space" over a given boundary as being acceptable for one, it needs to be acceptable for the other
|
It's not about acceptable or not acceptable. It's about completely in or completely out... in either example, the foot on the line is neither completely in or completely out - it's partially in and partially out.
In the contacting the ball case, to be called out, the foot has to be completely out. It's not. It's partially in, partially out. No out.
In the case you brought up, to be legal you must be completely in. It's not. It's partially in, partially out. Not legal.
You do not question the fact that these rules differ in cases where the foot is completely on the ground ... why would you question it in cases where the foot is not completely on the ground?