Quote:
|
You posted that verbatim 2 days earlier! Is this supposed to be in response to my question asking why you're concerned about cases where the opponent is past or moving away from the blocker? It doesn't fit that description at all, so now I just have to assume you're perseverating
|
I am not concerned with the two things you asked about, I think everyone agrees that both of those things make an eligible receiver no longer a potential blocker, why is it so hard to see there are 3 conditions that do the same thing and they are:
1. not attempting to block the defender
OR
2. moving away from the defender
OR
3. past the defender
and if you read this phrase, any block other that pushing or pulling is not legal
The contact may be a block or warding off the opponent who is attempting to
block
by pushing or pulling him
the CONTACT that is allowed is even defined!!!!