Thread: ratings
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 01, 2015, 03:55pm
jpgc99 jpgc99 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
How it works, to answer the OP, is that officials complain about it no matter what it is or isn't instead of focusing on something they can control.
This is true. The best answer is to ignore the ratings system and focus on self improvement - go to camp, break down film, ask for honest evaluation from respected peers.

The problem with all rating systems is the lack of consistency in the person completing the evaluation. In the past I worked in a state where coaches rated officials on a scale 1-5. One coach said that he would never give an official greater than a 3, no matter the circumstance. This was not typical of coaches in the schools served by the association because the average rating of varsity officials was always greater than 4.5.

If you worked several games for that coach, your rating would suffer due to no reflection of your actual performance but rather than luck of your assignments.

The main point is this: No system is perfect, most have serious flaws. But, they are not going to go away. You should focus your personal improvement on things you can control: appearance, mechanics, rules knowledge, judgement. Go to camp, break down film, and critique yourself. Do those things, and you will be respected as an official no matter what evaluation system is in place.
Reply With Quote