View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 23, 2015, 03:14am
hbk314 hbk314 is offline
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
I feel like the call wouldn't have developed anywhere near the level of controversy that it did if the rule were currently written as you suggest.

Your suggestion is making what seems to be the common interpretation a part of the rule and getting rid of the inconsistency between the written rule and the interpretation.
Reply With Quote