Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
The shot clock didn't start on time...it was delayed just a bit after blue clearly had control after the rebound.
However, it should not have been a shot clock violation as White #2 obtained control for a moment before the held ball occurred...changing possession and resetting the shot clock.
|
Camron is correct. The defense actually possessed the ball twice in this sequence. The first time near the division line and the second in the FT lane just before the held ball. The shot clock should have reset for the frontcourt possession by white (Ole Miss) making a 10-second violation impossible.
If the AP arrow favored BYU, then a full reset to 35 prior to the administration of the throw-in was warranted.