View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:59am
crosscountry55 crosscountry55 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
There was no time period recommended, or even mentioned, in the proposed rule change. It made the list because of the number of positive responses on the NFHS Questionnaire:

10. Would You Favor: Playing the game in halves?
I'm not opposed to it as long as they don't increase the number of allotted timeouts. Six to one, half dozen to another.

I'm sure they'd start with 16-min halves. States that wanted to try (or continue with) 18 would probably do so at the expense of conceding their periodic opportunity for a regional seat on the rules committee (the same way the shot clock states concede such a seat).
Reply With Quote