View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 06, 2015, 10:32pm
Pantherdreams Pantherdreams is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NB/PEI, Canada
Posts: 788
Wild oversimplification solutions:

A) If you want one vision then have 1 vision. You need a centralized voice and leadership not just suggesting officials do things a certain way but assigning and determining official development.

B) If your game can have a minimum of 68 possessions and you can make changes to make it have a minimum of 100 that seems to give you more chances to score.

C) Officiate the rule book with support and direction from the your centralized officiating body/office. If the rules get called without input on interpretation and types of game by coahes/AD's and conferences, then quality/type of player required to play in those games effectively changes.

D) Combining B+C drastically impacts style of play.

E) B through D + the elimination of live ball timeouts to negate even more coach control, you almost have a basketball game with players out trying to make plays instead of grind their way to tight ball games.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game!

Me: Thanks, but why the big rush.

Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we!
Reply With Quote