View Single Post
  #106 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 21, 2015, 08:20pm
Pantherdreams Pantherdreams is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NB/PEI, Canada
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post
.

The point I was making, and what has been skipped here, is that it's a dangerous play and something should be done to discourage it. The shooter did not create the dangerous part of the play, the defender did... hence the blocking call.
Why is the defender moving legally to protect themselves from imminent contact now the one you are making responsible for making the play more "dangerous". The shooter is the one who went airborne and is now out of control and about to run into a legally placed defender. Rules say the defender is allowed to protect themselves, now you want to enforce an interpretation that says the defender following the rules needs to be punished: for making the situation worse for the shooter by protecting themselves legally? Why is risk of injury/concussion/dental work etc to the defender of less concern to you then the offensive player when the defender is doing nothing wrong?
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game!

Me: Thanks, but why the big rush.

Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we!
Reply With Quote