View Single Post
  #72 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 20, 2015, 11:21am
letemplay letemplay is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I think the case could be worded better and/or you are mis-understanding the word "pivot."

Better for the case would be "it is a violation if A1 steps with either foot."

Travelling is "moving the pivot foot in excess of allowed limits" (or something like that. So, when we say "neither foot can be a pivot", it does not mean that neither foot can be lifted, nor does it mean that neither foot can be turned; it means that neither foot can be lifted and returned to the floor.
Well, yes..I def misunderstand THAT definition of the word "pivot". Guess I'll just stick with: if it looks like a duck...
Reply With Quote