|
To me, it appears as if H1 caused V1 to violate (9.1.3.b).
This would cause the play to become dead immediately and the ball be given to V for a throw-in. (Penalty 9.1.a)
If you watch the video over and over, it looks like H1 & V1 come into the lane about the same time, but it is H1 that begins first, IMO, causing V1 to move.
1) It looks like the official called a double violation, which I don't agree with.
2) In either case, the score was correctly cancelled
3) In this case, the throw-in appears to be via AP, which if a double violation, is correct
4) I think the only error was made calling a double violation, I would have called the violation on H1 and given the ball to V for OOB throw-in.
Thoughts?
|