Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Can anyone here say that he read this case and immediately decided, on his own, that it meant that conflicting signals obligated him to do something?
|
Yes.
The obstinate, dueling officials interpretation never entered my mind until you mentioned it.
It makes far more sense to make this a double foul by default so that the dueling, obstinate officials scenario never has a chance of happening.
And what Arem said is dead on. Until we see official language, communicated in an official capacity that this should be handled like it is in NCAA-W (and NCAA-W alone), I'm sticking with the common interpretation.