Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonboys03
In nfhs you enforce in the order of the events correct?
A1 is trapped on the sideline and calls time out. B1 ties up the ball with A1. Transitioning trail calls the timeout. A1 the swings an elbow towards B1. No contact was made but very definite attempt to make contact. C official comes in with a technical coul. I'm L watching this all unfold. C doesn't give the T a chance to report the timeout. C then says the tech negates the time out. But then he allows the free throws to be administered then gives them the time out.
After the game I mentioned it should have been. T blows whistle for time out. C blows whistle indicating and making a preliminary call of a technical. Then t reports the timeout to table . Then c reports the technical to the table. The timeout starts on the report from the T. Then after the time out ends the game is resumed by shooting the technical foul shoots and B1 getting the ball across from table at mid court.
So which way should this be administered?
|
When shi happens in a game i get the partner who made the T call with me while our 3rd watches the players. We go over what should be done. then go report. Here, i would have told the person who called the T to report both and say--we had a timeout by team A, which will be a full or 30...we also have a technical foul on player 32. the FTs for that technical will be shot following the TO. start the timeout clock.
if you think about it if there was a T and no timeout called until after you reported the T youd still give them the TO and shoot the free throws when you come back out of it. this falls into the shi happens when shi hits the fan category. slow down, breathe and talk about it to be sure you have it straight. easier said here in the forum..than in the heat of it all...good luck to you.