Quote:
Originally Posted by j51969
+1
I dont think the purpose and intent of the rule was to call this a violation. It would be nice for a clarification by NFHS on the above play. IMO It may not happen a lot, but it does occur enough to warrant discussion.
|
Pretty sure it's an old interp (2008, IMS) that has never been repeated nor refuted. Mostly, it's ignored.