Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
1. Mark, we are not speaking in absolutes.
2. We are making general statements on plays. We used words and phrases like "probably", "good indication", and "in all but the most rare circumstances". That leaves wiggle room because as you know Mark there is always a gray area in certain plays. That does not mean that we cannot say that from experience a certain type of play implies a certain type of result.
3. Seeing the whole play and making a decision as to the play are irrelevant to what johnny d and I are talking about. (Sorry johnny I don't mean to speak for you).
|
Everything that johny d and you have said has been in favor of absolutes.
One cannot just assume that because "bodies" are on the court that a foul has occured and that somebody MUST put air in his/her whistle. This has been an idiotic philosophy that some college and H.S. assigners have promoted for years; and it panders to coaches who think that because players are on the floor there must have been a foul.
I agree that if an illegal action has taken place then, if the officials are doing their jobs correctly, that illegal action will be seen and take appropriate action.
As I stated before:
First: See the whole play.
Second: Then make a decision as to whether an infraction of the rules has occured.
Three: One and Two above most definitely are logicial actions to take. And I would further add,
Four: If you, as an official are not doing One and Two, then why in the "H E Double Hockey Sticks" are you not?
MTD, Sr.