View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 27, 2000, 10:19am
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Not capitalism at all

The fundamental problem here is that MLB is not viewed legally nor is it managed like any normal capitalist business in the USA.

Most capitalist business have as an objective to take business away from their competitors. Who are the competitors of the NY Yankees? The Boston Red Sox? Baloney. The competitors of the NY Yankess are other entertainment and sports enterprises (movies, cable TV, the NFL, the NBA, etc.) The NY Yankees need other healthy, competitive MLB teams in order to stay in business. The individual teams are not independent capitalist businesses. MLB overall is the business enterprise. Yet, the US courts (e.g. free agency) coupled with the anti-trust exemption makes MLB this odd duck where teams act like competitors in player salaries, but act in collusion in other aspects of their business.

The rich teams (Yankees, Braves, Rangers, etc.) spend freely on salaries while depending on MLB to protect their ultimate business success by providing teams for them to compete with. The solution in my opinion is to either recognize that MLB is ONE business, and that players work for MLB, not individual teams, OR to cut each team loose from much of the business control of MLB.

The first is very messy, with all of the existing contracts in place.

The second, is very workable, however. Just give any team the right to locate anywhere they please, and the problem will largely go away over time. The Yankess & Mets would not be able to command such high local revenue if they also had to complete with relocated Twins, Royals, and Marlins suddenly located in various buroughs of NYC. If NYC could support 3 teams in the 40's, it can surely support 5 or 6 teams today. Do the same in the other large metro areas, and suddenly "small market team" has a whole new meaning.
Reply With Quote