Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachJW
Thank you for your input. It may be a stupid strategy, it may be a brilliant strategy. Assume now that the shooter is skilled at missing off the rim and the game reaches the "actionless contest" or "impasse" point (shooter keeps missing, opponent keeps violating, re-shoot, repeat). Is the consensus that you would have a warning, then a technical foul on the next violation? Given that you cannot force the shooter to make his shot and end the insanity, how many times would it have to occur before administering the warning?
|
This is an insightful post. If it's me, I'll probably give it five rounds or so, because I think somewhere in the five, a shooter will either brisk the net low or bank too high on the backboard, thereby yielding our double violation and allowing us to go to the arrow.
If he can do it five straight times, then he can probably do it all night and we need to try something else. I just don't know which team is more worthy of a warning and/or T at that point because they're both participants in the jackassery.