Quote:
Originally Posted by mutantducky
but I haven't
again. I don't know any refs who follow the rulebook literally. Not when the game is flowing.
so I'll ask you
A player goes for a jump shot. You, as the ref, see the defender moving forward into the landing space. You also see that clearly the offensive player is distracted by that. The offensive player lands and an instant later the defender hits into him, a clear foul. How can you not call a shooting foul in that situation? I'll call that a shooting foul because it is what the players and coaches expect it to be called. And many other refs would call that a shooting foul. If I go by the book literally, then that is not a shooting foul but I think that wouldn't be...kosher. yeah, kosher is the word.
|
If the shooter lands without hitting the defender, this is not a shooting foul. He wasn't in the landing space. Who's moving when contact is made? Because the way I picture your description, we may well have a foul on the shooter.
And I don't GAF what the coach expects to be called. The coaches who know the rules will expect this to be called by the rule.
Coach: Hadn't he landed?
You: Sure, but I still think it was a shooting foul.