Quote:
Originally Posted by La Rikardo
They could amend 5-1-2 pretty easily to cancel the goal in the event of any personal foul by an airborne shooter. Is there a reason the rule-makers don't want an intentional personal foul to cancel the goal?
|
I'm guessing because they never saw an intentional or flagrant foul on an airborne shooter and they never thought about it.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.
Lonesome Dove
|