The difference in interpretation/application seems to be in regards to 2-10-4, and whether the cancellation of activity during the free throw is specifically limited to the time used to shoot the free throw, ending when the free throw ends, which seems to be the basic intent of the statement, or the time involved until the error is corrected.
If the understanding is that the activities subject to cancellation are confined to during the free throw, then application of 2-10-5 would indicate that the subsequent foul at the other end would not be cancelled.
And 2-10-6 indicates that in the scenario being discussed, the POI would not be the unawarded free throw, but rather the point in the game following the stopage to make the correction.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . .
Last edited by Rob1968; Thu Dec 11, 2014 at 11:32am.
|