Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Agree. It is a violation.
The penalty can't just be to award a throwin since the offended team already has that. It has to be more if there is to be a penalty. The only thing we've got is a technical foul. That is pretty big for the situation, so the team gets a free one (the warning), then the next one costs them.
As for its effect on the AP arrow. It is a violation. The new throwin is for the violation. It is no longer an AP throwin.
|
except the dumb case play says the throwin remains an AP. see nevada earlier post...