Thu Oct 16, 2014, 07:25am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Even if you're right (and I think you likely are), it is still a dumb rule. If B1 can legally play the ball when it is held beyond the throwin plane, they should not , as long as the action is entirely on the inbounds side of the line, be liable for an IF if they miss the ball and hit the throwers arm instead. There is nothing about that play that needs to be an IF.
|
I agree with that.
|