Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsetter
If the ref determined that the ball was directed to the opponents, it would be a BRA. If there was simultaneous contact with the ball in the plane, it is a BRB regardless of the setters intent or if the blocker directs the ball back into the setter while the setter is still above the height of the net, it is also a BRB.
|
Can you please provide a rule reference for either a BRA or BRB violation in this situation?
It is my understanding that a player cannot be called for any BRB violation if they have no part of their body above the height of the net (and are not involved in a collective block).
It is also my understanding that a player cannot be called for any BRA violation if the ball is not completely above the height of the net (notwithstanding a libero with setting action on/in front of the attack line).
Further, I am unaware of any rule that specifically prohibits "simultaneous contact with the ball in the plane" if the BR player has no body part above the top of the net.