View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 26, 2014, 10:13pm
chapmaja chapmaja is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by twotakedown View Post
Interesting question. Looked it up.

NFHS case book

11.2.1 Ruling (a) and (b) replay, time-out and substitution not granted. Comment: Since the coach's actions distracted the opponent's serve,a replay is directed by the R1.

So it's just like a denied request. Play on until the next dead ball.
The only issue is with the wording. Since the coaches actions distracted the opponents serve, a replay is directed by the R1.

The problem is that if it is a replay, the time out request can be granted (8.1.6 C Comment, a replay and a reserve are not the same thing).

The problem is also that if it is called re-serve, this counts against a player, so it isn't fair to call it a reserve either.

Personally I think an additional note needs to be put in place regarding the term replay. A replay caused by a coaches action shall not allow substitutions, time outs, or substitution requests.
Reply With Quote