Wed Jul 30, 2014, 09:46am
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1
I understand your point. And I really wouldn't have a problem if baseball rules read that way. But I don't think we want to get into having one rule for a ball that might become fair, and another for a ball that will never be fair.
Don't ignore the possibility that F1/F3 might decide at the last moment to let the ball continue to roll, rather than touching it foul.
PLAY: R3, less than two outs. B1 hits a roller in foul ground up the first base line. As F1 is moving to "touch it foul", B1 collides with F1.
If you rule this a foul, then the offense has potentially gained a huge advantage, since R3 would score if the ball ends up being fair.
|
She's going to touch it foul. Waiting to see if it goes fair only lets the runners have more time to get to the base. 98% chance of no out and the run scoring. Not gonna happen.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
|