Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Bill
I was just concerned whether there should have been a foul or not. But, he was definitely charged for an illegal screen. The ref punched, pointing the other way while shouting "illegal". That's the extent of the mechanic(s) used, and that's standard around here for illegal screens.
Also, as an aside, I looked it up and the phrase "Illegal Screen" was used in the NFHS 2011-12 case book. Specifically:
"B1 is charged with an illegal screen against A2"
So, I think it's a term the NFHS is ok with.
|
Coach, the point I was trying to make, before all the drama with AremRed unfolded, was your player can be guilty of a blocking foul whether:
1- he actually set a screen or not
2- whether the dribbler used the screen or not.
Without being able to see the play, we can't tell you whether a foul occurred. But yes, it's possible.