View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 19, 2014, 10:39pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
Basically your saying that the batter did not intentionally interfere therefore, it is the fault of the catcher. That is NOT what the rule says. Intent has no bearing on whether or not the batter interfered with the catchers throw.

Advantage - Offense.
No, basically, I did not mention intent, and while I agree that intent has nothing to do with it I see no interference in the batter's actions. It was the fault of the catcher.
Reply With Quote