Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Because the throw-in location is now possibly a great distance away from where it was before and the action was not a throw-in violation. How do you account for that without any time coming off the clock?
A play took place which results in a new throw-in from a different location on the court. Doesn't that action need to be timed as part of the game (absent a rule such as the NCAA has)?
That is the logic being my thinking.
|
Is your Enter key broken? I agree with your reasoning on the OOB violation location vs. throw-in violation location. I don't think the clock can run if the first touch is a violation. I think that's common sense, and even old interpretations or the "history" you talk about shouldn't apply now. There are some rules where the history matters but I don't think this is one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
I wouldn't make a correction either way, however, during a game.
|
I think I would in a late game situation where the timer erroneously runs the clock. Could be important with only a few seconds left.