View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 08, 2014, 11:10pm
chapmaja chapmaja is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Yet the catcher waits until the runner gets halfway to 1B for an allegedly potential play? It's a bullshit interpretation
I agree, it is a BS interpretation on this. In my opinion, the only time interference should be called on a batter-runner who got a base on balls and is advancing to first is if she intentionally interferes with the throw to first base.

This proves inconsistency in the NFHS rules. In most other situations, there needs to be a play being made for interference to be called, but yet in this situation, not play can be made, but we can have interference.
Reply With Quote