Quote:
Originally Posted by kayla vb
That rules interp specifically says you cannot go back to the previous set though. The original post seemed to pretty clearly say that it was a legal player on the roster who was simply wearing the wrong number. That interpretation specifically states you may ONLY go back to the previous set if a player's NAME doesn't appear on the roster. That doesn't seem to be the case here.
|
I understand. Again, it's a practice that's not encouraged because of how dicey it can get. They're only encouraging it in the instance of roster usage ergo highlighting that note in the interp.
However, by rule, you are allowed to go back into previous sets if it's discovered that the illegal player was on the court during that time. Like I said, it's just not encouraged as an "industry standard".
The contradicting interp and the rule below was also something discussed in Kansas City the following week.
Quote:
|
7.3.5.4 Where a player is found to be on the court but he/she is not registered on the score sheet list of players, the opponent’s points remain valid, and in addition, they gain a 29 point and service. The team at fault will lose all points and/or sets (0-25, if necessary) gained from the moment the non-registered player entered the court, and will have to submit a revised line-up sheet and send a new registered player into the court, in the position of the non-registered player.
|