View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2003, 11:55am
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
"Of course it was provable. The mitt fit. "

I didn't say it wasn't provable, just that in general you need a strong case for an ejection based on intent.


"Batter hit a home run last time up and hot-dogged it around the bases. Next time up, pitcher plunks him/her in the ribs. Need proof?"

I guess I don't have a retaliatory mind.


"This would be a good opportunity for his partner to step in and make the ejection"
I'll deal with my own problems, thank you. But I do think it's good officiating for the partner to approach when the argument starts.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote