View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2003, 11:21am
ChuckElias ChuckElias is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by bigwhistle
If you advocate having the T (or C in 3 person) standing on the sideline squared up, how can you make anyone believe that you are able to see the players on the opposite lane line that are your responsibility. They can't enter the lane until the ball touches iron. By placing yourself that far over, you are putting yourself in a straight line situation.
Hmmmm, "how can you make anyone believe. . .?" I'm not trying to make anyone believe anything. Just throwing out some stuff that has worked for me.

Why would you not believe that the official can see the opposite lane line from the sideline? I just don't understand what your objection is here. The only problem you might have is if you stood on the sideline at the foul line extended. Then maybe you have a hard time seeing the low block on the opposite lane line. But the new alignment will help b/c you won't have anybody in the top lane space.

Also, there's no requirement that the official stand right at the foul line extended. If you watch 3-whistle college games, the C official is usually at the top of the FT circle, then steps down when the FT is released. The T in a 2-whistle game can do the same thing. I don't see anything wrong with this.

Quote:
Cheating toward the backcourt places you even farther away from the action.
What action? We're talking about observing players while the FT shooter still has the ball. All you need to see is if somebody steps in early. If an official can't see that from the top of the FT circle, then he has bigger problems than worrying about positioning.

The only action during a FT is most likely to take place behind the FT shooter. Everybody on the lane has to stay in a spot, but the players off the lane can jockey for position or wander wherever they want. You better know where they are and what they're doing. If you have to take two steps toward midcourt to do it, then that's what I'd suggest you do.

You'll get closer to the "action" on the rebound anyway, b/c. . .

Quote:
On all shots, the outside official should be stepping toward the baseline where the shot is going up.

We're in total agreement here. If the official starts out at the top of the FT circle, then when s/he steps to the baseline, s/he will end up right at the FT line extended, which is perfect position to observe weak-side rebounding.

Quote:
Bailing out to worry about the other end will just leave your partner hung out to dry.
I think you've misunderstood what I meant to say in my last post. I didn't advocate "bailing out". I never said, "run to the backcourt while the FT is in the air". All I said was that the Trail official (whether in 2-whistle or 3-whistle) could cheat a couple of steps toward midcourt if there are opponents near the opposite basket.

Quote:
There are always decisions that have to be made in every game. You must determine which area you are willing to compromise coverage for in order for that individual game to be best officiated.
So which would you rather miss: a guy who steps into the FT lane a half second too early, or a foul on the shooter during a fast break? Me, I'm going to cheat a couple steps (NOT bail out) to get a better look at those two guys in case of a quick long pass.

The bottom line for me is this: I cannot leave opponents unattended behind me, period. If that means I have to sacrifice a bit of FT coverage, so be it.

If that's not "believable" to you, that's fine too

Chuck

[Edited by ChuckElias on Jun 30th, 2003 at 12:34 PM]
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote