Tue Apr 22, 2014, 07:13am
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 98
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsetter
USAV:
Ref asks coach of team A to have player change libero jersey because it is marginally contrasting.. Team has only one libero. Coach agrees.
Team wins Set one 25 - 14.
Set two score is 22 - 12....someone notices libero number is not the same as on the line-up and score sheet.
The alternate jersey has a different number than the original that the coach wrote on the lineup.
Forfeit set one 0 - 25, set two is now 0 - 12....set two lost 24 - 26.
Team A is now not in the gold bracket...good news is they blow everyone away in the silver.
Is this the intent of the 'illegal player on the court' rule? This does not seem to be in the spirit of the game.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antonio.King
Is it the intent of the rule? No, it's not. Though a big POE this year was for extra care when it came to line up submission, both on the officiating corps as well as the coach. Ultimately, though, the responsibility relies on the coach.
What'd they do about the libero situation when the set resumed 0-12? If the coach was smart, he would've redesignated.
|
This is covered in the latest rules interpretation.
https://www.volleyballreftraining.co...s_Interp_1.pdf
|