Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
But this situation is clearly stated in the casebook. This has a very specific application.
|
Clearly stated? You think that this play clearly states that signals, even though not mentioned at all, obligate us to report a block and a charge on the same play, which is by definition, impossible. Well now there are three of us on record as saying this is not clear at all.
I was told to take my argument to a higher authority. I did so, with great success if I must say so myself.
I turn the challenge around now. One of you find out who wrote this case play and get an explanation from that person to say whether the common
(mis)perception was indeed its original intended purpose. Even if it was I now have more than enough backing for my position to continue on the current path.