Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
I would stop at her interpretation. There can only be one interpretation, not 50 different ones nor states that do not like hers so they do something else.
MTD, Sr.
|
I disagree with you on some level. If there is a loophole or something not specifically stated, I have no problem with a state saying, "This is what we will do in (fill in the blank)."
But this situation is clearly stated in the casebook. This has a very specific application. There is no wiggle room here. I think JAR just was being difficult trying to even argue this point and Ms. Wynn did not review her organization's information or literature.
Peace