Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
I thought this one had some interesting findings. |
More BS from an environment that accepts (and tracks stats) on errors by players and coaches of the games but, when it comes to the officials then the data says they are bias or bad. Double standard in my book.
Why is a batter considered good when he is only effective 30% of the time.
A pitcher maybe 50% and a fielder maybe 80%. However they want the official to be 100%. When in fact, they ARE closer to 100% than any one else on the field when it comes to doing their job.
Sorry, just because we have the ability to capture more data than ever before, does not mean we are still smart enough to correctly properly analysis it.
In fact, one could also surmise that the interpreters of this data were .... BIAS????