Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
If I understand correctly now, it is a given in both plays under discussion that the player was in the act of shooting. Some say he gets no shots if it is obvious that the contact changes his intention, while others say he gets no shots if he's not obviously still trying to shoot regardless of his intentions.
There is no way to justify this that I can see.
|
I don't think it's a given. The previous discussion included many who would argue that if the player proceeds to pass after he fouled, then they would judge he was going to pass all along.
I disagree, although I think the number of plays this would affect over the course of a given official's career is likely to be less than a handful.