View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 24, 2014, 04:06am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
You're saying he can't get FTs if he is shooting but gives up after getting fouled and can't get the shot off due to the foul.
No, I'm saying if he gets fouled and decides to pass the ball instead of attempt a shot, then I'm not giving him FT's. I consider the play as a whole, I don't try to guess what he was doing. I call what he actually did.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Clever argument. You're the one claiming a player must continue to shoot after being fouled in order to still be considered to be shooting. As the one making that claim, it would be upon you to provide the citation to back up that claim.
I am claiming that. Unlike you however, I am not claiming any rules basis. Why do I need to provide a rules reference if I am not appealing to one? You are the one who countered that my method of determining shooting versus passing does not follow the rule. Thus, the burden to provide a rule reference lies with you and you alone

Thanks for that rule reference. As I thought, it is up to my (sometimes poor) judgement to determine whether a player is shooting or passing. My method for doing so involves seeing the play start, develop, and finish and making a judgement based on what the player actually does. I am sorry if my method perterbs you, but I cannot read a players mind as to what he wants to do. What he does is what I call.

Last edited by AremRed; Mon Mar 24, 2014 at 07:48am. Reason: grammar