Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The mistake is not what the signals were, but the fact that both made preliminary signals at all on the double whistle.
|
I was referring to the way the play was described in the email ("mistakenly give opposite preliminary signals").
We all know what the mistake was. The play should have been a charge, and one official called a block. Or the play should have been a block, and one official called a charge.
The caseplay still doesn't encourage us to get together, discuss it ("Hey BillyMac, did you get a good look at his feet?"), and come up with a single, unified call. I wish it did. Rather, it encourages us to get together, discuss it ("Hey BillyMac, remember 4.19.8 Situation C ?"(Yeah. That's right. That's the way we discuss things here in my little corner of Connecticut)), and come up with the double foul.