|
It's All In The Wording ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The mistake is not what the signals were, but the fact that both made preliminary signals at all on the double whistle.
|
I was referring to the way the play was described in the email ("mistakenly give opposite preliminary signals").
We all know what the mistake was. The play should have been a charge, and one official called a block. Or the play should have been a block, and one official called a charge.
The caseplay still doesn't encourage us to get together, discuss it ("Hey BillyMac, did you get a good look at his feet?"), and come up with a single, unified call. I wish it did. Rather, it encourages us to get together, discuss it ("Hey BillyMac, remember 4.19.8 Situation C ?"(Yeah. That's right. That's the way we discuss things here in my little corner of Connecticut)), and come up with the double foul.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Last edited by BillyMac; Sun Mar 16, 2014 at 02:10pm.
|