Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The casebook is clear about what to do when both fouls are reported. The question is whether both fouls must be reported when conflicting signals are given.
|
I think that I get it. Are we debating what the word "call" means? Does it mean "(preliminary) signal", or does it mean "report"?
4.19.8 SITUATION C: A1 drives for a try and jumps and releases the ball.
Contact occurs between A1 and B1 after the release and before airborne shooter
A1 returns one foot to the floor. One official
calls a blocking foul on B1 and the
other official
calls a charging foul on A1. The try is (a) successful, or (b) not successful.
RULING: Even though airborne shooter A1 committed a charging foul, it
is not a player-control foul because the two fouls result in a double personal foul.
The double foul does not cause the ball to become dead on the try. In (a), the goal
is scored; play is resumed at the point of interruption, which is a throw-in for
Team B from anywhere along the end line. In (b), the point of interruption is a try
in flight; therefore the alternating-possession procedure is used. (4-36)