Quote:
Originally Posted by azbigdawg
Assume no obstruction call on the play.
|
Well, if there is no obstruction, then 12.13.1 doesn't apply. If there had been obstruction, then a Safe call on the runner plus the ejection due to a flagrant collision would be the appropriate decision.
12.13.2 also doesn't apply since the catcher did not have possession of the ball and was waiting to make a tag.
If this were a case where the runner is not doing something flagrant, then it would be a no call, as Approved Ruling 12.13.3.2 points out. Since the PU ejected this runner, he judged the collision flagrant.
Frankly, I'm surprised there isn't an NCAA rule that covers a flagrant collision when the fielder is not in possession of the ball, but is also not obstructing. I suppose he could eject the runner just in general for unsporting behavior. But there is nothing supporting the out call.
Bottom line: I'm confused by the out and ejection call. I think the PU screwed the pooch on this one.