View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 24, 2003, 11:25am
zebraman zebraman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
Julie,

AS JR said, the ball was live so you could just call it as a common foul. Technically, I suppose it's termed a "false multiple foul" since one team fouled twice and the clock never started following the first.

From your description, it sounds like it might have been an intentional foul. A technical foul might have even been a good call to send a message and prevent further "shenanigans."

Z
Reply With Quote